쁘띠 거니 http://itviewpoint.com/52691 , 자장 거니 http://itviewpoint.com/52733 , 그리고 사퇴 거니 http://itviewpoint.com/55333 까지 한 사람의 극과 극을 보여주는 이건희 http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/이건희 의 행동은 IT산업에 큰 영향을 줬다. 이후 현 정부의 판단에 대해서는 따로 평하지 않겠다. 말도 안되는 사면이니... 하지만 IOC가 발표한 아래와 같은 소식은 분명히 국내외적으로 시사하는 바가 크다. 국민의 보편적인 법감정이라는 말을 알아줬으면 좋겠다.


이건희 징계버거 확정 http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=60100209094513

IOC 공식 발표 자료 http://www.olympic.org/en/content/The-IOC/Commissions/The-ethics-commission/?Tab=4&articleNewsGroup=-1&articleId=76796


하지만 삼성 옴니아2 생산공장의 시계는 여전히 돌아간다. 그게 모순이다.


ITViewpoint 서명덕 기자



1ORIGINAL: FRENCHINTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEEETHICS COMMISSIONDECISION with recommendationsNo. D/01/2010CASE N° 4/2008Mr Kun-Hee Lee, IOC member,Domiciled in Seoul, Republic of KoreaREFERRAL and FACTS:In a letter dated 17 April 2008, the IOC President referred the situation of Mr Kun-Hee Lee, IOC member, to the Ethics Commission, after he had been accused ofbreach of trust and tax evasion involving more than 112 billion Korean Won(approximately USD 108 million).In a decision by the Seoul Court of Appeal dated 14 August 2009, which becamefinal, Mr Kun-Hee Lee was sentenced to a suspended term of three years’imprisonment and a fine of 110 billion Korean Won for tax evasion, a stock marketoffence and breach of trust, due to the illegal sale of shares in a Samsung Groupcompany. Mr Kun-Hee Lee paid the fine.In a decision by the President of the Republic of Korea, Mr Kun-Hee Lee wasgranted an individual amnesty on 31 December 2009.Mr Kun-Hee Lee sent written observations to the Ethics Commission on 13January 2010. He argued that his case merited a moderate sanction, observingthat that the acts for which he was convicted did not constitute a violation of ethics,and that his conduct had not been damaging to the Olympic Movement. He alsoemphasised that he has always supported the Olympic and Sports Movementthrough his sponsorship of both the Olympic Games and of various InternationalSports Federations.OPINION:The Ethics Commission has taken note of the decision handed down by the SeoulHigh Court on 14 August 2009; the individual decision by the President of theRepublic of Korea dated 31 December 2009 to annul the effects of the sentence ofa suspended term of three years’ imprisonment, suspended for five years; and thewritten observations made by Mr Kun-Hee Lee.The Ethics Commission notes that removal of the sentence leaves intact the actsfor which Mr Kun-Hee Lee was convicted.In this regard, the Ethics Commission recalls that, whether or not the conduct of anOlympic party is ethical, is wholly independent of its criminal nature. Indeed,although the same acts may or may not be a criminally punishable depending onthe law in different countries, they may nevertheless be ethically reprehensible.As a result, the Ethics Commission, having regard to the ethical principles set outin the Olympic Charter and the IOC Code of Ethics, must render a decision on the2court’s findings of fact in the case which are final and upon which the Commissionmust base itself.The Ethics Commission, taking into consideration the nature of the acts of whichMr Kun-Hee Lee was found guilty, deems that his conduct has tarnished thereputation of the Olympic Movement, in the meaning of part B.5 of the IOC Codeof Ethics.Duly taking into account the facts of the case and the principle of proportionality, itrecommends that, for Mr Kun-Hee Lee, there be a combination of the sanctionsprovided under Rule 23.1.1 of the Olympic Charter, namely a reprimand and asuspension of the right to be a member of any IOC Commission for five years.DECISION:The Ethics Commission, after deliberating in accordance with its Statutes,recommends that, pursuant to Rule 22 of the Olympic Charter, the IOC ExecutiveBoard:1. decide that Mr Kun-Hee Lee, IOC member, has violated theethical principles set out in the Olympic Charter and the IOCCode of Ethics, has tarnished the reputation of the OlympicMovement and was thereby in breach of the Olympic Charterand the IOC Code of Ethics;2. pursuant to Rule 23.1.1 of the Olympic Charter, impose thefollowing sanctions on Mr Kun-Hee Lee:a) a reprimandb) and a suspension of the right to sit on any IOCcommission for five years.Done in Lausanne, 25 January 2010For the Chairman,Pâquerette Girard ZappelliEthics Commission Secretary

07 FEBRUARY 2010
IOC decision on Mr Kun Hee Lee

10 views 1 2 3 4 5
The IOC Executive Board today decided to approve the Ethics Commission's recommendations relating to the case of Mr Kun Hee Lee.
 
The IOC Executive Board today decided :

1. that Mr Kun Hee Lee, IOC member, has violated the ethical principles set out in the Olympic Charter and the IOC Code of Ethics, has tarnished the reputation of the Olympic Movement and was thereby in breach of the Olympic Charter and the IOC Code of Ethics;

2. pursuant to Rule 23.1.1 of the Olympic Charter, to impose the following sanctions on Mr Kun Hee Lee:
a)   a reprimand 
b)   and a suspension of the right to sit on any IOC commission for five years.


The full text of the IOC Ethics Commission’s recommendation and decision
http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Commissions_PDFfiles/Ethics/Ethics_Lee_Decision_02_10.pdf

Share
profile

안녕하세요. ITViewpoint 스타터이자 공동 에디터 '서명덕 기자' 입니다. 닉네임은 떡이떡이 입니다.

 

이 곳은 블로그미디어이며, 개인 공간은 http://itviewpoint.thoth.kr/ 을 메인으로 옮겨 갈 생각입니다.


개인적인 목적이라면 콘텐츠 막펌을 전면 허용 http://itviewpoint.com/blog/54971 합니다. 다만 비상업적인 용도에 한하며, 상업적인 용도라면 별도로 문의하세요. RSS http://itviewpoint.com/blog/rss 는 전문 제공합니다.